In plain words
Nor should one say that Tat or Tvam may abandon the contradictory part of its own meaning and, together with the part that remains, indicate the meaning of Tvam or Tat—so why accept Bhāga-lakṣaṇā in some other manner?
Nor should one say that Tat or Tvam may abandon the contradictory part of its own meaning and, together with the part that remains, indicate the meaning of Tvam or Tat—so why accept Bhāga-lakṣaṇā in some other manner?