In English
There is an incident which brings out that he clearly demonstrated and demarcated one’s rights and claims. There was always a close and intimate relationship between and . In this context of close friendship and taking advantage of such close friendship, went close to on one night and tried to get answers for some of his doubts. asked , “Have I got the right to get a sacred text like the taught by you, especially when I know that I am suffering from ego and when I know that I do not have any superior knowledge? There is the all-knowing , who is very wise, and in his presence, I am like a small lamp in the presence of a huge light. Under such circumstances, have I the right to learn the from you? What is the meaning of picking me up and teaching me the ? Perhaps was not suitable because he was on the side of the , but we have who is the embodiment of , and on all counts, he deserves to be taught the , and why is it that he was ignored? There is also my elder brother who was bypassed? While these superior persons , , and were there, why is it that they have been ignored and I, who am immersed in seeking material benefits all the time, have been chosen for this; and do I have the right to be chosen like this?” Then drew close to him affectionately and said, “You are thinking that I, in my divine compassion, am doing you some favour. This is not true. You are not able to recognise the great human qualities, and you think I am doing you a favour. This is not correct. As you said, is a very learned man; but in spite of his wisdom and in spite of his recognising that the are the embodiment of truth and they follow and his accepting that the follow , he has gone and joined the side of . What is the meaning of this? I do not like this riding two horses at the same time. I do not agree to this. You people have been regarding as a great man. I do not agree with this attitude of yours. A is one in whom the thought, word, and deed harmonise completely. A person in whom the thought is one, word is another, and deed is yet another cannot be called a great man. He will be called a (an evil person). He is unable to recognise the meaning and the significance of his action when, on the one hand, he says that the are good people and that victory is going to be on the side of good people and yet leads the army of the , whom he acknowledges as bad people.