In English
exhibited the totality of the stream of love or has taken the form of . If was attached to and was attached to , it simply means that and were attached to each other. This is a silver tumbler. It is not possible for us to remove the silver from the tumbler. Because, the silver and the tumbler have joined together, we call it a silver tumbler. In the same manner, it is not possible to separate and from each other. Because and are identical with each other, it is one single entity. Without or creation, there is no , without , we will not be able to see creation. We cannot have a cloth without the thread and the thread without the cloth. The oneness of the cloth and the thread exemplifies the aspect of and . I have told you many times that does not simply mean the form of a woman. It is something far more important. The language develops as a confluence of several letters. The letters come together to form a word. In the word, we have the letters R-A-D-H-A. When we commence with A we get ; when we commence with D we get and in reverse direction it reads . Thus, the word means, one who constantly chants the name of the Lord. Everyone who does the can be described as . The word does not relate to a feminine gender indicating the name of a woman at all. ’s aspect demonstrates that there is no such difference at all in the presence of divinity. In this manner, has been spreading the concept of pure love. Only when we can exterminate jealousy, will we be able to develop pure love. There is no objection to desiring what you want, but it is wrong to develop jealousy at what others have. In this manner, was showing the divine path to the and . All of ’s actions are essentially divine. Unless we understand this, we will not be able to know the true aspect of . He was looking at living creation with the same attitude. Here, you may get some doubts as to why such a person caused the killing of nearly forty of . There is one simple explanation for this. In a human body, if there is a cancerous growth and in this growth there will be millions of disease-carrying germs. Because of these germs, there is a possibility of the entire body being infected and becoming cancerous. At that time, a doctor will decide to amputate that part of the body which has become cancerous. The doctor will not worry about his having to exterminate millions of germs. His primary concern is to perform the operation and save the patient. Is it good to perform the operation and save the patient or is it good to think that by performing the operation, he will be killing millions of germs and therefore give up the operation? Since the germs may cause harm to many other people, the doctor will decide to kill all the germs. I have already mentioned earlier that the same was implemented by .