US-P18.152ab ।US-P18.152cd ॥
In plain words
The seer is simply, immediately here; the seen is only what turns up to be perceived. So what kind of relation could hold between them? Set aside "one sees, the other is seen" — and what relation is left to name?
Close to the Sanskrit
For the seer, which is immediately self-evident, what sort of relation will be possible with the seen, which is merely perceptible — any other, that is, leaving aside seer-and-seen-ness?