। ॥ १३ ॥
In plain words
Even learned discrimination between Ātma, the Self, and Anātma, the non-Self, has no appeal for me. Anātma does not exist; what exists has a form within perception—who, then, can make the distinction? Ah, it is those who have not seen Ātma who keep turning over false doctrines and their arguments. They are the deluded, not those who have crossed beyond. One whose understanding is firm stands silent as stone.
Close to the Sanskrit
Even the discrimination made by the learned between Ātma—the Self—and Anātma, the non-Self, does not please me. Anātma does not exist; what exists has a form within the range of the senses. Who, then, is capable of discriminating? Ah, those who have not seen Ātma occupy themselves with thought about inquiry into false doctrines. They alone are deluded, not those who have crossed beyond. A person of firm understanding stands silent as a stone.