यस्मिन् संख्यानामरूपभेदादिः न विद्यते इति असंख्येयः ।अप्रमेय आत्मा स्वरूपमस्येति अप्रमेयात्मा ।अतिशेते सर्वम् अतो विशिष्टः ।शिष्टं शासनं करोतीति शिष्टकृत्; शिष्टान् करोति पालयतीति वा ।सामान्यवचनो धातुर्विशेषवचनो दृष्टः कुरु काष्ठानीत्याहरणे यथा, तद्वदिति वा शि
In plain words
Because in Him all distinctions of number, name, and form are absent, He is 'Asaṃkhyeyaḥ', the Innumerable. Because His inner nature is unfathomable, He is 'Aprameyātmā', of Immeasurable Essence. Because He transcends all creation, He is 'Viśiṣṭaḥ', the Supreme. Because He enacts moral governance, He is 'Śiṣṭakṛt', the Legislator; or because He protects and nurtures the virtuous. Just as a verbal root of general import takes on a specific meaning in context—as 'do' becomes 'fetch the firewood'—so too is it here...
Close to the Sanskrit
In whom distinctions of number, name, form, and the like do not exist, thus Asaṃkhyeyaḥ (the innumerable). One whose essence is immeasurable, Aprameyātmā. He surpasses everything, therefore Viśiṣṭaḥ (the distinguished). Because He issues laws and governance, Śiṣṭakṛt (the legislator); or because He protects and shapes the refined ones. Just as a root with a general meaning is seen to have a specific meaning, as in 'fetch the firewood', similarly in this case... or.