। ॥ ९२ ॥
In plain words
Or suppose the objects belong to the mind — then why doesn't it know them all at once? Because it depends on something other than itself. And of that blunder, who is the rescuer?
Close to the Sanskrit
Or if the object is of the mind, then why does it not know simultaneously? Since, because of its dependence on another — of that carelessness who is the rescuer?